Lunsford & Lunsford v. Sallas

65 So. 2d 542, 37 Ala. App. 185
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 19, 1953
Docket4 Div. 196
StatusPublished

This text of 65 So. 2d 542 (Lunsford & Lunsford v. Sallas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lunsford & Lunsford v. Sallas, 65 So. 2d 542, 37 Ala. App. 185 (Ala. Ct. App. 1953).

Opinion

PRICE, Judge.

Plaintiff recovered judgment for damages against defendant in the sum of $750.

The appeal here is on the record proper without official report of the proceedings and evidence on the trial.

Appellant assigns as error the overrulling of demurrer to counts 2, 3 and 4 of the amended complaint.

The record discloses no ruling as to counts 3 and 4 of the amended complaint, the demurrer being directed only to count 2. Barney Coal Co. v. Davis, 9 Ala.App. 235, 62 So. 985.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barney Coal Co. v. Davis
62 So. 985 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 So. 2d 542, 37 Ala. App. 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lunsford-lunsford-v-sallas-alactapp-1953.