Lunsford & Lunsford v. Sallas
This text of 65 So. 2d 542 (Lunsford & Lunsford v. Sallas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff recovered judgment for damages against defendant in the sum of $750.
The appeal here is on the record proper without official report of the proceedings and evidence on the trial.
Appellant assigns as error the overrulling of demurrer to counts 2, 3 and 4 of the amended complaint.
The record discloses no ruling as to counts 3 and 4 of the amended complaint, the demurrer being directed only to count 2. Barney Coal Co. v. Davis, 9 Ala.App. 235, 62 So. 985.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
65 So. 2d 542, 37 Ala. App. 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lunsford-lunsford-v-sallas-alactapp-1953.