Lunn v. Holiday Corp.
This text of 167 A.D.2d 818 (Lunn v. Holiday Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: Resolution of this appeal requires a determination whether Manfred Stumpf, to whom the summons and complaint in this action were delivered on October 1, 1987, is a person authorized within the meaning of CPLR 311 (1) to accept service on behalf of Columbia Sussex Corporation. The matter is remitted to Supreme Court for a hearing and determination of that issue.
All concur, except Boomer, J., who dissents and votes to reverse and dismiss the complaint, in the following memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
167 A.D.2d 818, 563 N.Y.S.2d 691, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lunn-v-holiday-corp-nyappdiv-1990.