Lunkenheimer Co. v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Lunkenheimer Co. v. State

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 98, 1928 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 32

Court of Claims of Illinois·Decided October 24, 1928·No. No. 1217·Published

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

The claimant, an Ohio corporation, seeks to recover on account of franchise taxes and initial, fees alleged to be wrongfully collected by the Secretary of State.

This court is of the opinion that claimant had an adequate remedy at law in courts of general jurisdiction as expressed by this court in the opinion filed in the case of the Moline Plow Company v. State of Illinois, and in the case of Geo. P. Ide & Co., Inc., v. State of Illinois, No. 1215.,

Therefore it is recommended by this court that this claim be disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

The claimant, an Ohio corporation, seeks to recover on account of franchise taxes and initial, fees alleged to be wrongfully collected by the Secretary of State.

This court is of the opinion that claimant had an adequate remedy at law in courts of general jurisdiction as expressed by this court in the opinion filed in the case of the Moline Plow Company v. State of Illinois, and in the case of Geo. P. Ide & Co., Inc., v. State of Illinois, No. 1215.,

Therefore it is recommended by this court that this claim be disallowed.

Lunkenheimer Co. v. State, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 98, 1928 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 32 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1928).

Pincite

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 98 (Lunkenheimer Co. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.