Luneau v. Murrell

197 So. 171, 1940 La. App. LEXIS 163
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedMay 3, 1940
DocketNo. 6116.
StatusPublished

This text of 197 So. 171 (Luneau v. Murrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Luneau v. Murrell, 197 So. 171, 1940 La. App. LEXIS 163 (La. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

TALIAFERRO, Judge.

Plaintiff sues to recover damages for an amount in excess of Six Thousand ($6,000) Dollars and for causes of action alleges that defendant caused him to be illegally *172 arrested, imprisoned and in addition, slandered and defamed his character. Exceptions of no cause and of no right of action filed by the defendant were sustained and the suit dismissed. Plaintiff prosecutes appeal.

Appellee filed here a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that this court is without jurisdiction ratione materiae of the demand, which we cannot consider for the reason below assigned.

The record does not disclose that the lower court signed a judgment dismissing the case after sustaining the above mentioned exceptions, and no such judgment is in the record. The existence of a signed judgment is an indispensable prerequisite to the right of appeal in a case of this character. The absence of such a judgment, we must take notice of ex pro-prio motu; and for these reasons, the appeal is dismissed at appellant’s cost. Riley Feed Manufacturing Co. v. Rogers et al., La.App., 160 So. 330.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Riley Feed Mfg. Co. v. Rogers
160 So. 330 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 So. 171, 1940 La. App. LEXIS 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luneau-v-murrell-lactapp-1940.