Lundschien v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Lundschien v. State

185 S.W. 22, 79 Tex. Crim. 345, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 138

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 5, 1916·No. No. 3991.·Published

Opinion

HARPER, Judge.

Appellant was prosecuted for wilfully and maliciously killing a mule, the property of W. F. Lundschien, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $200.

Appellant was tried the 8th day of last October, and that term of court adjourned on October 23, 1915. The Assistant Attorney General has moved to strike out the statement of facts and bills of exception, because not filed within the time allowed by law. The motion is sustained, and the judgment is affirmed. De Friend v. State, 69 Texas Crim. Rep., 329, 153 S. W. Rep., 881; Durham v. State, 69 Texas Crim. Rep., 71, 155 S. W. Rep., 222.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARPER, Judge.

Appellant was prosecuted for wilfully and maliciously killing a mule, the property of W. F. Lundschien, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $200.

Appellant was tried the 8th day of last October, and that term of court adjourned on October 23, 1915. The Assistant Attorney General has moved to strike out the statement of facts and bills of exception, because not filed within the time allowed by law. The motion is sustained, and the judgment is affirmed. De Friend v. State, 69 Texas Crim. Rep., 329, 153 S. W. Rep., 881; Durham v. State, 69 Texas Crim. Rep., 71, 155 S. W. Rep., 222.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Lundschien v. State, 185 S.W. 22, 79 Tex. Crim. 345, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 138 (Tex. 1916).

Pincite

185 S.W. 22 (Lundschien v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related