Lundquist v. United States

134 S. Ct. 1940, 188 L. Ed. 2d 956, 572 U.S. 1084, 82 U.S.L.W. 3629, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 3079
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 28, 2014
DocketNo. 13–8703.
StatusPublished

This text of 134 S. Ct. 1940 (Lundquist v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lundquist v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 1940, 188 L. Ed. 2d 956, 572 U.S. 1084, 82 U.S.L.W. 3629, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 3079 (U.S. 2014).

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and *1941petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of Paroline v. United States, 572 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 1710, 188 L.Ed.2d 714 (2014).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Paroline v. United States
134 S. Ct. 1710 (Supreme Court, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 S. Ct. 1940, 188 L. Ed. 2d 956, 572 U.S. 1084, 82 U.S.L.W. 3629, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 3079, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lundquist-v-united-states-scotus-2014.