Lundquist v. Staff Leasing/WC Dept.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lundquist v. Staff Leasing/WC Dept.

896 So. 2d 961, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4296, 2005 WL 708404

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 30, 2005·No. No. 1D05-0196·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In light of the provision of the order being appealed holding a portion of appellant’s claim for reimbursement of prescription expenses in abeyance, we dismiss the appeal as being taken from a nonfinal, nonappealable order. This disposition is without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek review upon rendition of a final, ap-pealable order.

ALLEN, DAVIS and BROWNING, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In light of the provision of the order being appealed holding a portion of appellant’s claim for reimbursement of prescription expenses in abeyance, we dismiss the appeal as being taken from a nonfinal, nonappealable order. This disposition is without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek review upon rendition of a final, ap-pealable order.

ALLEN, DAVIS and BROWNING, JJ„ concur.

Lundquist v. Staff Leasing/WC Dept., 896 So. 2d 961, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4296, 2005 WL 708404 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

896 So. 2d 961 (Lundquist v. Staff Leasing/WC Dept.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.