Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Lundquist v. Lundquist

Lundquist v. Lundquist

184 A.D. 949
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1918·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Thomas, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. J., dissented upon the ground that the proof does not establish a ease within the rule of Kennedy v. Kennedy (73 N. Y. 369); Barber v. Barber (168 App. Div. 212), and Donohue v. Donohue (180 id. 561), with whom Blackmar, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lundquist v. Lundquist, 184 A.D. 949 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1918).

184 A.D. 949 (Lundquist v. Lundquist) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kennedy v. . Kennedy
73 N.Y. 369 (New York Court of Appeals, 1878)
Barber v. Barber
168 A.D. 212 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)