Lundin v. Davis

210 P. 579, 36 Idaho 258, 1922 Ida. LEXIS 160
CourtIdaho Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 2, 1922
StatusPublished

This text of 210 P. 579 (Lundin v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lundin v. Davis, 210 P. 579, 36 Idaho 258, 1922 Ida. LEXIS 160 (Idaho 1922).

Opinion

LEE, J.

The questions which are presented by this appeal are identical with those discussed in the companion case, Bogue Supply Co. v. Nickey et al., ante, p. 249, 210 [259]*259Pac. 577. By agreement of all parties, the two actions below were consolidated for the purposes of the trial, and both were tried at the same time and to the same jury, which rendered separate verdicts upon which separate judgments were entered, respondents in this case being a copartnership instead of a corporation.

Upon the authority of that case and for the reasons therein stated, the judgment in this case is reversed and the cause remanded, with instructions to vacate the judgment and grant a new trial. Costs awarded to appellant.

•McCarthy and Dunn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bogue Supply Co. v. Davis
210 P. 577 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
210 P. 579, 36 Idaho 258, 1922 Ida. LEXIS 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lundin-v-davis-idaho-1922.