Lundin v. Davis

210 P. 579, 36 Idaho 258, 1922 Ida. LEXIS 160
Idaho Supreme Court·Decided November 2, 1922·Published

Opinion

LEE, J.

The questions which are presented by this appeal are identical with those discussed in the companion case, Bogue Supply Co. v. Nickey et al., ante, p. 249, 210 [259] Pac. 577. By agreement of all parties, the two actions below were consolidated for the purposes of the trial, and both were tried at the same time and to the same jury, which rendered separate verdicts upon which separate judgments were entered, respondents in this case being a copartnership instead of a corporation.

Upon the authority of that case and for the reasons therein stated, the judgment in this case is reversed and the cause remanded, with instructions to vacate the judgment and grant a new trial. Costs awarded to appellant.

•McCarthy and Dunn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lundin v. Davis, 210 P. 579, 36 Idaho 258, 1922 Ida. LEXIS 160 (Idaho 1922).

210 P. 579 (Lundin v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bogue Supply Co. v. Davis
210 P. 577 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1922)