Lundeen v. Dermer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lundeen v. Dermer

469 So. 2d 935, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1331, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14068

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 28, 1985

DocketNo. 85-43

StatusPublished

This text of 469 So. 2d 935 (Lundeen v. Dermer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lundeen v. Dermer, 469 So. 2d 935, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1331, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14068 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order under review is a non-final order entered subsequent to settlement, granting appellee’s motion for contempt [936]*936and to enforce the court’s order approving a stipulation between the parties.

It is appellant’s contention that the trial court erred in holding that appellant had violated the stipulation and order, therefore there was no basis for holding appellant in contempt.

We have carefully considered appellant’s contention on appeal in the light of the briefs and arguments of counsel and the record prepared by the parties, and have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated. Accordingly, the order appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order under review is a non-final order entered subsequent to settlement, granting appellee’s motion for contempt [936]*936and to enforce the court’s order approving a stipulation between the parties.

It is appellant’s contention that the trial court erred in holding that appellant had violated the stipulation and order, therefore there was no basis for holding appellant in contempt.

We have carefully considered appellant’s contention on appeal in the light of the briefs and arguments of counsel and the record prepared by the parties, and have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated. Accordingly, the order appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

469 So. 2d 935, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1331, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lundeen-v-dermer-fladistctapp-1985.