Lunde v. Paulson

2019 ND 5, 921 N.W.2d 402
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 2019
Docket20180248
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 ND 5 (Lunde v. Paulson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lunde v. Paulson, 2019 ND 5, 921 N.W.2d 402 (N.D. 2019).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Brad Paulson appealed from a default judgment ordering him to pay $1.5 million in damages to Paul Lunde stemming from a May 2015 physical altercation. Paulson argues he was not properly served either the summons and complaint nor the notice of motion for default judgment.

[¶2] Rule 60(b), N.D.R.Civ.P., is the exclusive means for opening a default judgment and, when made for reasons of mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect, must be made within one year after a default judgment has been entered. Flemming v. Flemming , 2010 ND 212 , ¶ 3, 790 N.W.2d 762 ; N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(c). We conclude there are no irregularities on the face of the default judgment, and we affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). See Burgard v. Burgard , 2013 ND 27 , ¶ 11, 827 N.W.2d 1 ("[w]hen a default judgment is appealed, rather than a district court's order regarding a N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion to vacate the default judgment, we review the default judgment to determine if irregularities appear on the face of the judgment").

[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jon J. Jensen

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nygaard v. Volker, et al.
2026 ND 50 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2026)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 ND 5, 921 N.W.2d 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lunde-v-paulson-nd-2019.