Lundberg v. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co.

261 A.D. 907, 25 N.Y.S.2d 187, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8042
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 3, 1941·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Appeal by plaintiff in an action for wrongful death (a) from an order of the Supreme Court dismissing the complaint, and (b) from the judgment entered thereon. The ground of dismissal is that the action is barred by the two-year limitation prescribed in section 130 of the Decedent Estate Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 13). Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the authority of Mossip v. Clement & Co. (256 App. Div. 469; affd., without opinion, 283 N. Y. 554). The authorities upon which appellant relies, typical of which is Crapo v. City of Syracuse (183 N. Y. 395), are sui generis, having no relation to the provisions of Decedent Estate Law, section 130, here involved, or to predecessor statutes. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lundberg v. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co., 261 A.D. 907, 25 N.Y.S.2d 187, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8042 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

261 A.D. 907 (Lundberg v. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Huntington v. Samaritan Hospital
666 P.2d 405 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1983)
Ratka v. St. Francis Hospital
378 N.E.2d 1027 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
Mehrer v. North Ninth Lumber Co.
195 Misc. 566 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)
Rose v. United States
73 F. Supp. 759 (E.D. New York, 1947)