Lundahl v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Supreme Court

Lundahl v. Eli Lilly & Co.

544 U.S. 997, 125 S. Ct. 1940

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedApril 25, 2005

Docket04-8838

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 544 U.S. 997 (Lundahl v. Eli Lilly & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lundahl v. Eli Lilly & Co., 544 U.S. 997, 125 S. Ct. 1940 (2005).

Pincite

Opinion

C. A. 10th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein. Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this 'petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. A. 10th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein. Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this 'petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

544 U.S. 997, 125 S. Ct. 1940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lundahl-v-eli-lilly-co-scotus-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack