Lund v. Atchison, Topeka Etc. Ry. Co.

California Court of Appeal

Lund v. Atchison, Topeka Etc. Ry. Co.

152 P. 313, 28 Cal. App. 324, 1915 Cal. App. LEXIS 274

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedSeptember 2, 1915

DocketCiv. No. 1565.

StatusPublished

This text of 152 P. 313 (Lund v. Atchison, Topeka Etc. Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lund v. Atchison, Topeka Etc. Ry. Co., 152 P. 313, 28 Cal. App. 324, 1915 Cal. App. LEXIS 274 (Cal. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

The only point presented upon this appeal is as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings and judgment of the court. Upon a careful examination of the record we find that there is a substantial conflict in the evidence in respect to those findings of which the appellant complains; and this being so, the findings of the trial court, and the judgment founded thereon, will not be disturbed upon appeal.

The judgment and order denying defendant's motion for a new trial are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The only point presented upon this appeal is as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings and judgment of the court. Upon a careful examination of the record we find that there is a substantial conflict in the evidence in respect to those findings of which the appellant complains; and this being so, the findings of the trial court, and the judgment founded thereon, will not be disturbed upon appeal.

The judgment and order denying defendant's motion for a new trial are affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 P. 313, 28 Cal. App. 324, 1915 Cal. App. LEXIS 274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lund-v-atchison-topeka-etc-ry-co-calctapp-1915.