Lund v. Alanis
384 S.W.2d 123
Opinion
George LUND, Petitioner,
v.
Avero Alanis ALANIS et al., Respondents.
Supreme Court of Texas.
Barnes & Elick, McAllen, for petitioner.
Luther E. Jones, Jr., Corpus Christi, Frank R. Nye, Jr., County Atty., Rio Grande City, Emilio F. Gutierrez, Rio Grande City, for respondents.
*124 PER CURIAM.
The trial court dismissed this cause, and its action was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 381 S.W.2d 955. The cause is now moot and hence the order of dismissal should stand. We dismiss the application for writ of error without reference to the merits. Guajardo v. Alamo Lumber Co., 159 Tex. 225, 317 S.W.2d 725.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lund v. Alanis, 384 S.W.2d 123 (Tex. 1964).
384 S.W.2d 123 (Lund v. Alanis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dinkel Enterprises, Inc. v. Colvin (In Re Bailey Pontiac, Inc.)
139 B.R. 629 (N.D. Texas, 1992)
Jones v. States
552 S.W.2d 578 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1977)
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. City of Kountze
543 S.W.2d 871 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1976)
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Preston
515 S.W.2d 929 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1974)
Lefebvre v. Lefebvre
510 S.W.2d 29 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1974)