Lunceford v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Lunceford v. State

87 S.E. 151, 17 Ga. App. 415, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 471

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 9, 1915

Docket6985

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 87 S.E. 151 (Lunceford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lunceford v. State, 87 S.E. 151, 17 Ga. App. 415, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 471 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, J.

1. Under tlie ruling in Duren v. Thomasville, 125 Ga. 1 (53 S. E. 814), tliere is no merit in tlie first and second grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial.

2. The charge of the court complained of was not erroneous for the reason assigned. It was more favorable to the defendant than a strictly accurate charge on the subject would have been.

3. There was some evidence to sustain the verdict, and, it having been approved by the trial judge, this court will not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Colley & Colley, for plaintiff in error. F. W. Gilbert, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI