Lunareye, Inc. v. Matal
This text of Lunareye, Inc. v. Matal (Lunareye, Inc. v. Matal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
LUNAREYE, INC., Appellant
v.
JOSEPH MATAL, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR, U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor ______________________
2016-1413, 2016-1837 ______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2014-00712, IPR2014-01213. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
STEPHEN W. ABBOTT, Prebeg, Faucett & Abbott PLLC, Houston, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by MATTHEW COMPTON, JR., CHRISTOPHER M. FAUCETT.
LORE A. UNT, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FRANCES LYNCH, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER, MAI-TRANG DUC DANG. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, O’MALLEY, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
July 24, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lunareye, Inc. v. Matal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lunareye-inc-v-matal-cafc-2017.