Lunan v. Jones (In Re Lunan)
This text of 518 F. App'x 442 (Lunan v. Jones (In Re Lunan)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Chapter 7 Debtor Susan H. Lunan, proceeding pro se, appeals a district court order dismissing her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order granting Trustee David H. Jones’s motion to compel her to vacate property. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
Because Lunan repeatedly failed to provide a transcript of the bankruptcy court’s hearing during which the Trustee’s order was granted, as required by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8006, the district court appropriately dismissed her appeal. See Fed. R. Bankr.P. 8001(a); see also Kloian v. Acker (In re Kloian), 72 Fed.Appx. 364, 365 (6th Cir.2003) (per curiam).
We, therefore, affirm the district court’s order. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2)(C).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
518 F. App'x 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lunan-v-jones-in-re-lunan-ca6-2013.