Lunacy of Raeder
31 A. 929, 167 Pa. 597, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 953
Opinion
There appears to be nothing in this record that would justify us in sustaining either of the specifications of error. The questions therein presented are sufficiently answered by the learned president of the common pleas in his opinion sustaining exceptions to the auditor’s report.
On that opinion the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lunacy of Raeder, 31 A. 929, 167 Pa. 597, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 953 (Pa. 1895).
31 A. 929 (Lunacy of Raeder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Simco's Estate
6 Pa. D. & C. 813 (Schuylkill County Court of Common Pleas, 1925)
Peters's Estate
73 Pa. Super. 530 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1920)
Kellerman's Estate
52 Pa. Super. 412 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1913)