Lumsden v. Sabo
This text of 256 A.D. 861 (Lumsden v. Sabo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by defendants from a judgment of $2,000 in favor of plaintiff, on account of personal injuries, in an automobile negligence action. It is asserted that the verdict is excessive. The plaintiff, at the time of the trial, six months after the accident, was still suffering from pain and a thirty-five to forty per cent limitation of motion of the right arm and shoulder. Her earnings had been reduced about eighty dollars a month. Her physician stated upon the trial that it was his opinion that it would be several months before she would recover from the injury to her arm and shoulder. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Bliss and HeSernan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
256 A.D. 861, 8 N.Y.S.2d 690, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lumsden-v-sabo-nyappdiv-1939.