Lumsden v. Davis
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION
RAYMOND E. LUMSDEN #2109472 § § V. § W-20-CV-113-ADA § LORIE DAVIS, et al. §
ORDER
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order (#31). Defendants previously filed a Motion to Dismiss (#10), which the Court converted to a Motion for Summary Judgment (#13). On June 15, 2020, Defendants filed a supplemental brief in support of summary judgment to which they attached several affidavits and other records (#23). Plaintiff subsequently filed a brief in opposition (# 27) and the matter is now ripe for adjudication. On September 28, 2020, Defendants received Plaintiff’s request for admissions. Defendants object to this request on the grounds that they have raised the issue of qualified immunity in their summary judgment briefing and have attached to that briefing all the evidence the Court needs to resolve the issue of qualified immunity. Defendants therefore request the Court relieve them from responding to any further discovery requests from Plaintiff until it rules on their motion for summary judgment. In , the Supreme Court held that until the issue of immunity is resolved, discovery should not be allowed. , 457 U.S. 800, 818 (1982). However, not all discovery is forbidden; only discovery which is either avoidable or over broad. , 834 F.2d 504, 507 (5th Cir. 1987). The Fifth Circuit has stated “when the district court ‘is unable to rule on the immunity defense without further Clarification of the facts’ and when the discovery order is ‘narrowly tailored to uncover only those facts needed to rule on the immunity claim’ an order allowing such limited discovery is neither avoidable nor overly broad.” Wicks v. Miss. State Empt Servs., 41 F.3d 991, 994 (5th Cir. 1995) (quoting Lion Boulos, 834 F.2d at 507-08). It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order (#31) is granted in part. It is finally ORDERED that discovery is limited to that which is necessary to address the qualified immunity issue. SIGNED on October 13, 2020 (Yon SO\oe Ls ALAN D ALBRIGHT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lumsden v. Davis (Lumsden v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.