Lumpp v. Lumpp
This text of 239 A.D. 875 (Lumpp v. Lumpp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We hold that the evidence presented a question of fact which should have been passed upon by the jury as to whether the defendant committed adultery with Eugene J. Smith on the dates and at the places designated in each of the first two questions, and that the trial court erred in directing the jury to answer said questions in the negative. All concur. Judgment and order in so far as it relates to the first two questions reversed upon the law and the order otherwise affirmed, without costs, and a new trial granted upon the first tifco questions certified for submission to the jury.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 A.D. 875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lumpp-v-lumpp-nyappdiv-1933.