Lumpkin v. the Maule Ojus Rock Co.

133 So. 344, 101 Fla. 64
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 3, 1931·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lumpkin v. the Maule Ojus Rock Co., 133 So. 344, 101 Fla. 64 (Fla. 1931).

133 So. 344 (Lumpkin v. the Maule Ojus Rock Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maule Ojus Rock Co. v. Lumpkin
151 So. 505 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)