Lumpkin v. State
885 So. 2d 931, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15399, 2004 WL 2347558
Opinion
Nasedra Lumpkin challenges the denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm without prejudice to his right to file a legally suffi[932] cient motion addressing his claim of entitlement to jail credit. See Trapkin v. State, 830 So.2d 172 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); See also Gethers v. State, 838 So.2d 504 (Fla.2003); Daniels v. State, 491 So.2d 543 (Fla.1986).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lumpkin v. State, 885 So. 2d 931, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15399, 2004 WL 2347558 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
885 So. 2d 931 (Lumpkin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gethers v. State
838 So. 2d 504 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)
Trapkin v. State
830 So. 2d 172 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Toro v. State
719 So. 2d 947 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Daniels v. State
491 So. 2d 543 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)