Lumpkin v. State

885 So. 2d 931, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15399, 2004 WL 2347558
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 20, 2004
DocketNo. 4D04-3753
StatusPublished

This text of 885 So. 2d 931 (Lumpkin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lumpkin v. State, 885 So. 2d 931, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15399, 2004 WL 2347558 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Nasedra Lumpkin challenges the denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm without prejudice to his right to file a legally suffi[932]*932cient motion addressing his claim of entitlement to jail credit. See Trapkin v. State, 830 So.2d 172 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); See also Gethers v. State, 838 So.2d 504 (Fla.2003); Daniels v. State, 491 So.2d 543 (Fla.1986).

STONE, WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gethers v. State
838 So. 2d 504 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)
Trapkin v. State
830 So. 2d 172 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Toro v. State
719 So. 2d 947 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Daniels v. State
491 So. 2d 543 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
885 So. 2d 931, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15399, 2004 WL 2347558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lumpkin-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.