Lumpkin v. State
This text of 885 So. 2d 931 (Lumpkin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Nasedra Lumpkin challenges the denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm without prejudice to his right to file a legally suffi[932]*932cient motion addressing his claim of entitlement to jail credit. See Trapkin v. State, 830 So.2d 172 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); See also Gethers v. State, 838 So.2d 504 (Fla.2003); Daniels v. State, 491 So.2d 543 (Fla.1986).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
885 So. 2d 931, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15399, 2004 WL 2347558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lumpkin-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.