Lumpkin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lumpkin v. State

717 So. 2d 122, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11451, 1998 WL 568039

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 9, 1998

DocketNo. 97-2094

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 717 So. 2d 122 (Lumpkin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lumpkin v. State, 717 So. 2d 122, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11451, 1998 WL 568039 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

While there is no arguable error in the adjudication and sentence of appellant, a point not raised is the absence in the record of a written order of revocation of probation with the reasons for revocation set forth therein as required in Watts v. State, 688 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). We remand with direction for entry of such written order.

GUNTHER and GROSS, JJ., and GLICKSTEIN, HUGH S., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

While there is no arguable error in the adjudication and sentence of appellant, a point not raised is the absence in the record of a written order of revocation of probation with the reasons for revocation set forth therein as required in Watts v. State, 688 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). We remand with direction for entry of such written order.

GUNTHER and GROSS, JJ., and GLICKSTEIN, HUGH S., Senior Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

717 So. 2d 122, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11451, 1998 WL 568039, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lumpkin-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack