Lumpkin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lumpkin v. State

717 So. 2d 122, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11451, 1998 WL 568039

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 9, 1998·No. No. 97-2094·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

While there is no arguable error in the adjudication and sentence of appellant, a point not raised is the absence in the record of a written order of revocation of probation with the reasons for revocation set forth therein as required in Watts v. State, 688 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). We remand with direction for entry of such written order.

GUNTHER and GROSS, JJ., and GLICKSTEIN, HUGH S., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

While there is no arguable error in the adjudication and sentence of appellant, a point not raised is the absence in the record of a written order of revocation of probation with the reasons for revocation set forth therein as required in Watts v. State, 688 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). We remand with direction for entry of such written order.

GUNTHER and GROSS, JJ., and GLICKSTEIN, HUGH S., Senior Judge, concur.

Lumpkin v. State, 717 So. 2d 122, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11451, 1998 WL 568039 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

717 So. 2d 122 (Lumpkin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related