Lumpkin v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Lumpkin v. State

144 S.W.3d 281, 355 Ark. 677, 2004 Ark. LEXIS 56

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJanuary 29, 2004

DocketCR 04-39

StatusPublished

This text of 144 S.W.3d 281 (Lumpkin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lumpkin v. State, 144 S.W.3d 281, 355 Ark. 677, 2004 Ark. LEXIS 56 (Ark. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant James Lumpkin, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, Don Etherly, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant James Lumpkin, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, Don Etherly, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 S.W.3d 281, 355 Ark. 677, 2004 Ark. LEXIS 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lumpkin-v-state-ark-2004.