Lummus v. Ransom

168 So. 241, 123 Fla. 830, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1974
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 31, 1934
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 168 So. 241 (Lummus v. Ransom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lummus v. Ransom, 168 So. 241, 123 Fla. 830, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1974 (Fla. 1934).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Davis, Mr. Justice Whitfield, and Mr. Justice Buford are of the opinion that the decree of the Circuit Court should be reversed while Mr. Justice Ellis, Mr. Justice Terrell and Mr. Justice Brown are of the opinion that the said decree should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no pros *831 pect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State, ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the decree of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Behnke-Walker Business College v. Multnomah County
146 P.2d 614 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 So. 241, 123 Fla. 830, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lummus-v-ransom-fla-1934.