Lumley v. Wainwright
This text of 227 So. 2d 194 (Lumley v. Wainwright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Respondent having filed a response to the order directing him to show lawful cause for the detention and imprisonment of Petitioner, and it appearing Petitioner fails [195]*195to demonstrate within the meaning and requirements of Schaeffer v. Wainwright (Fla. 1969), 218 So.2d 442, and Powe v. State (Fla. 1968), 216 So.2d 446, the potential existence of those facts necessary to charge the State with the duty of advising Petitioner and providing him with the assistance of counsel for the purpose of directly appealing his judgment of conviction, the writ of habeas corpus is hereby discharged.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
227 So. 2d 194, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lumley-v-wainwright-fla-1969.