Lumley v. State

2 S.E.2d 518, 59 Ga. App. 903, 1939 Ga. App. LEXIS 449
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 11, 1939·No. 27487·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. “A new trial will not be granted in a criminal case because of the relationship within the prohibited degrees of a juror to the accused, although such relationship was unknown to the accused and his counsel until after verdict.” Downing v. State, 114 Ga. 30 (39 S. E. 927); Barnes v. State, 17 Ga. App. 266 (2) (86 S. E. 461); Maxwell v. State, 28 Ga. App. 120 (110 S. E. 120); Durham v. State, 41 Ga. App. 421(4) (153 S. E. 222); Dawson v. State, 13 Ga. App. 668 (79 S. E. 745), and cit. Under the quoted ruling the sole special ground of the motion for new trial is without merit.

2. The evidence, while conflicting, authorized the verdict; and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lumley v. State, 2 S.E.2d 518, 59 Ga. App. 903, 1939 Ga. App. LEXIS 449 (Ga. Ct. App. 1939).

2 S.E.2d 518 (Lumley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wooten v. State
245 S.E.2d 34 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)