Lumley v. Crawford

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lumley v. Crawford

213 S.W.3d 712, 2007 WL 445348

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 13, 2007·No. WD 66664·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Department of Corrections appeals a trial court ruling on a legislative amendment in 2003 to Section 559.115 that prohibits the State from treating the first 120-day incarceration as a commitment for purposes of establishing a minimum prison term on a subsequent offense. The trial court ruled that the amendment could be given retroactive application to the petition for mandamus brought by the respondent, Lumley. The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Dudley v. Agniel, 207 S.W.3d 617 *713 (Mo.2006) held such application did not violate Section 1.160. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Department of Corrections appeals a trial court ruling on a legislative amendment in 2003 to Section 559.115 that prohibits the State from treating the first 120-day incarceration as a commitment for purposes of establishing a minimum prison term on a subsequent offense. The trial court ruled that the amendment could be given retroactive application to the petition for mandamus brought by the respondent, Lumley. The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Dudley v. Agniel, 207 S.W.3d 617 *713 (Mo.2006) held such application did not violate Section 1.160. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Lumley v. Crawford, 213 S.W.3d 712, 2007 WL 445348 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

213 S.W.3d 712 (Lumley v. Crawford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related