Lumley, Jason AKA Lumley, Jason Dean

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 22, 2017
DocketWR-87,432-01
StatusPublished

This text of Lumley, Jason AKA Lumley, Jason Dean (Lumley, Jason AKA Lumley, Jason Dean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lumley, Jason AKA Lumley, Jason Dean, (Tex. 2017).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS WR-87,432-01

EX PARTE JASON LUMLEY, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. D35606-CR IN THE 13TH DISTRICT COURT FROM NAVARRO COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of four offenses in

a multi-count indictment: Count 1 for evading arrest; Count 2 for accident involving injury; Count

3 for accident involving injury; and Count 4 for unauthorized use of a motor vehicle. Applicant was

assessed punishment at 40 years’ confinement in Count 1; at 50 years confinement’ in Count 2; at

50 years’ confinement in Count 3; and at 455 days in a State Jail facility in Count 4. The Tenth

Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Lumley v. State, No. 10-15-00267-CR (Tex. App.—Waco 2

Dec. 17, 2015)(not designated for publication).

This Court received Applicant’s application on September 18, 2017 and denied relief without

a written order, based on the trial court’s findings, on October 6, 2017. Subsequently, this Court

received a letter from Applicant, that the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law signed by the

habeas judge had been vacated. In the letter, the habeas judge stated that he had voluntarily recused

himself on April 22, 2015 and signed the Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law in error. The

district clerk has supplemented the record with the judge’s certificate of recusal and the notice

vacating the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.

Therefore, we withdraw, sua sponte, our previous order of denial based on the trial court’s

Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law. After a review of the record, the Applicant’s claims are

denied.

Filed: November 22, 2017 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lumley, Jason AKA Lumley, Jason Dean, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lumley-jason-aka-lumley-jason-dean-texcrimapp-2017.