Lumilite Industries, Inc. v. Southeast Life Insurance
This text of 365 So. 2d 1083 (Lumilite Industries, Inc. v. Southeast Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiffs, beneficiaries in a life insurance contract, sued their insurance carrier for failure to pay benefits upon a controverted claim. They added a count claiming an independent tort for the failure to pay the claim, alleging bad faith on the part of the insurance company and failure to make a proper investigation of the claim. Discovery was had and, upon both parties moving for summary judgment, affidavits were filed. The trial court entered a partial summary judgment holding that there were no genuine issues of material fact on count two, which claimed punitive damages, and that the defendant insurance company was entitled to a summary judgment on that count. This appeal is from that partial summary judgment.
The trial judge correctly determined that there were no genuine issues of material fact with regard to the allegations in count two. The defendant was entitled to summary judgment under the rule set forth in Allstate Insurance Company v. Gibbs, 340 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). See also Baxter v. Royal Indemnity Company, 285 So.2d 652 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
365 So. 2d 1083, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lumilite-industries-inc-v-southeast-life-insurance-fladistctapp-1979.