Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. Flindt
139 S.E. 128, 37 Ga. App. 72, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 463
Opinion
In this case, which arose under the workmen’s compensation law, the main and controlling facts, so far as they related to the cause and circumstances of the claimant’s injury, were the same as those in Maryland Casualty Co. v. Peek, 36 Ga. App. 557 (137 S. E. 121), and the decision in that case governs this case. The order of the Industrial Commission denying compensation was authorized, if not demanded, by the evidence, and the superior court erred in sustaining the appeal of the claimant.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. Flindt, 139 S.E. 128, 37 Ga. App. 72, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 463 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).
139 S.E. 128 (Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. Flindt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Peek
137 S.E. 121 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)