Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. DeMaio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. DeMaio

259 A.D.2d 292, 686 N.Y.S.2d 395, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2276

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 4, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D.2d 292 (Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. DeMaio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. DeMaio, 259 A.D.2d 292, 686 N.Y.S.2d 395, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2276 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Patricia Williams, J.), entered February 13, 1998, which granted respondent Vincent DeMaio’s motion for renewal, but upon renewal adhered to its prior determination granting petitioner insurer’s application to permanently stay arbitration, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court correctly concluded that the uninsured vehicle in question was not “in use” within the meaning of the uninsured motorist endorsement in the relevant policy (see, Lumbermen's Mut. Cas. Co. v Logan, 88 AD2d 971; Matter of Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth. [Gholson], 71 AD2d 1004, 1005; McConnell v Fireman's Fund Am. Ins. Co., 49 AD2d 676, 677). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Lerner, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Patricia Williams, J.), entered February 13, 1998, which granted respondent Vincent DeMaio’s motion for renewal, but upon renewal adhered to its prior determination granting petitioner insurer’s application to permanently stay arbitration, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court correctly concluded that the uninsured vehicle in question was not “in use” within the meaning of the uninsured motorist endorsement in the relevant policy (see, Lumbermen's Mut. Cas. Co. v Logan, 88 AD2d 971; Matter of Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth. [Gholson], 71 AD2d 1004, 1005; McConnell v Fireman's Fund Am. Ins. Co., 49 AD2d 676, 677). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Lerner, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D.2d 292, 686 N.Y.S.2d 395, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lumbermens-mutual-casualty-co-v-demaio-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack