Lumberman's Bank v. Huston

Supreme Court

Lumberman's Bank v. Huston

167 U.S. 203, 17 S. Ct. 995, 42 L. Ed. 136, 1897 U.S. LEXIS 2095

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 10, 1897·No. No 203·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Hablan

delivered the opinion of the court.

The most favorable view of this case for the plaintiff' in error is to regard it as presenting the same question that was determined *204 in Twin City National Bank v. Nebeker, just decided. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case the judgment is

Mr. John J. Crawford for plaintiff in error. Mr. Solicitor General for defendant in error.

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice White concurred in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Hablan

delivered the opinion of the court.

The most favorable view of this case for the plaintiff' in error is to regard it as presenting the same question that was determined *204 in Twin City National Bank v. Nebeker, just decided. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case the judgment is

Mr. John J. Crawford for plaintiff in error. Mr. Solicitor General for defendant in error.

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice White concurred in the result.

Lumberman's Bank v. Huston, 167 U.S. 203, 17 S. Ct. 995, 42 L. Ed. 136, 1897 U.S. LEXIS 2095 (1897).

Pincite

167 U.S. 203 (Lumberman's Bank v. Huston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related