Lumberman's Bank v. Bearce
41 Me. 505
Opinion
There is no foundation for exceptions to the instructions of the presiding Judge to the jury.
The damages in this case were not reduced by the oath of the defendant. The plaintiffs are entitled to judgment on the verdict, and their costs.
The defendant is not entitled to costs.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lumberman's Bank v. Bearce, 41 Me. 505 (Me. 1856).
41 Me. 505 (Lumberman's Bank v. Bearce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.