Lumberas v. State

560 S.W.2d 644, 1977 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1279
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 16, 1977·No. 52313·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

*645 OPINION

ROBERTS, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for sale of phentermine. 1 After finding appellant guilty, the jury assessed appellant’s punishment at nine years’ confinement.

In reviewing the record we have determined that the judgment must be reversed because of unassigned error. Art. 40.09(13), Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.

In Riddle v. State, 560 S.W.2d 642 (Tex.Cr.App.1977), the defendant was charged with delivery of phentermine. In Riddle we held that there is no longer any penalty provided for the possession or delivery of phentermine. For the reasons stated in Riddle this rule also applies to this appellant’s sale of phentermine. 2

Therefore, as in Riddle, the judgment must be reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

1

. On September 15, 1976, in an unpublished opinion, this appeal was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is now reinstated.

2

. As in Riddle, the appellant was alleged to have committed the offense after the date phentermine was added to Schedule IV of the Controlled Substances Act. See footnote 2 of the Riddle opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lumberas v. State, 560 S.W.2d 644, 1977 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1279 (Tex. 1977).

560 S.W.2d 644 (Lumberas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chalin v. State
645 S.W.2d 265 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1983)
Grady v. State
634 S.W.2d 316 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1982)
Ex Parte Wilson
588 S.W.2d 905 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1979)
Ex Parte Ashcraft
565 S.W.2d 926 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)
Ex parte Page
563 S.W.2d 822 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)