Home/New York Court of Appeals/Lumb v. . Lumb

Lumb v. . Lumb

112 N.E. 1064, 217 N.Y. 671, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1444
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 7, 1916·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative; no opinion.

Concur: Collin, Cuddeback, Seabury and Pound, JJ. Dissenting: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase and Cardozo, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lumb v. . Lumb, 112 N.E. 1064, 217 N.Y. 671, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1444 (N.Y. 1916).

112 N.E. 1064 (Lumb v. . Lumb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.