Lumb v. . Lumb
112 N.E. 1064, 217 N.Y. 671, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1444
This text of 112 N.E. 1064 (Lumb v. . Lumb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lumb v. . Lumb, 112 N.E. 1064, 217 N.Y. 671, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1444 (N.Y. 1916).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative; no opinion.
Concur: Collin, Cuddeback, Seabury and Pound, JJ. Dissenting: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase and Cardozo, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
112 N.E. 1064, 217 N.Y. 671, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lumb-v-lumb-ny-1916.