Lumart Improvement Corp. v. Koepel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lumart Improvement Corp. v. Koepel

9 A.D.2d 787, 193 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5897

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 23, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 9 A.D.2d 787 (Lumart Improvement Corp. v. Koepel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lumart Improvement Corp. v. Koepel, 9 A.D.2d 787, 193 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal, as limited by appellants’ brief, from so much of an order as denied a motion to transfer two actions from the District Court, Nassau County, to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, and to consolidate said actions with an action pending in that court. Order insofar as appealed from reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion for consolidation granted. The Supreme Court action seeks compliance with the same contracts on which the plaintiffs in the District Court actions seek recovery for work, labor and services. There was no opposition to the motion for consolidation, and it would serve the interests of all the parties to have the three actions tried at the same time in the Supreme Court. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur. Murphy, J., deceased.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal, as limited by appellants’ brief, from so much of an order as denied a motion to transfer two actions from the District Court, Nassau County, to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, and to consolidate said actions with an action pending in that court. Order insofar as appealed from reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion for consolidation granted. The Supreme Court action seeks compliance with the same contracts on which the plaintiffs in the District Court actions seek recovery for work, labor and services. There was no opposition to the motion for consolidation, and it would serve the interests of all the parties to have the three actions tried at the same time in the Supreme Court. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur. Murphy, J., deceased.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 A.D.2d 787, 193 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lumart-improvement-corp-v-koepel-nyappdiv-1959.