Lumarque v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n

164 So. 3d 734, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7032, 2015 WL 2219350
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 13, 2015
DocketNo. 3D14-1824
StatusPublished

This text of 164 So. 3d 734 (Lumarque v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lumarque v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n, 164 So. 3d 734, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7032, 2015 WL 2219350 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

WELLS, Judge.

In these consolidated appeals, Raymond Lamarque, the defendant below, appeals from both a default entered below and a final judgment thereon. Based upon the appellees’ confession of error, and Cohen v. Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A., 433 So.2d 1354, 1355 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) (finding that a party who has filed a “paper” in the action is entitled to adequate notice of the application for default under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.500(b), and that the notice should be “given in sufficient time to permit some meaningful action to be taken upon it after its receipt”), we vacate the default and the final judgment entered thereon and remand to the trial court for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Barnett Bank of South Florida, NA
433 So. 2d 1354 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 So. 3d 734, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7032, 2015 WL 2219350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lumarque-v-federal-national-mortgage-assn-fladistctapp-2015.