Luman v. Neete
This text of 42 Ky. 165 (Luman v. Neete) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered, the opinion of the Court.
Had it clearly appeared that, notwithstanding the official return of nulla bona, the assignee knew that the obligor had properly which might be subjected to an execution on his judgment against him, it might have been his duty to proceed against that property, before he would be entitled to recourse on his assignor.
But proof merely of the fact that there was such estate, was insufficient to repel the presumption of legal diligence, and good faith, implied by the Sheriff’s return that no property could be found.
The Circuit Court did not err, therefore, in rejecting proof of the latter fact only.
Wherefore, as this is the only question involved in this case, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 Ky. 165, 3 B. Mon. 165, 1842 Ky. LEXIS 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luman-v-neete-kyctapp-1842.