Luma v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Luma v. State

895 So. 2d 1202, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2025, 2005 WL 418705

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 23, 2005

DocketNo. 3D04-2685

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 895 So. 2d 1202 (Luma v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Luma v. State, 895 So. 2d 1202, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2025, 2005 WL 418705 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of the defendant’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) finding that his claim of vindictive sentencing cannot be raised in a motion to correct illegal sentence. Wright v. State, 891 So.2d 618 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Boyd v. State, 880 So.2d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). We also certify direct conflict with Johnson v. State, 877 So.2d 795 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

Affirmed; direct conflict certified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of the defendant’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) finding that his claim of vindictive sentencing cannot be raised in a motion to correct illegal sentence. Wright v. State, 891 So.2d 618 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Boyd v. State, 880 So.2d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). We also certify direct conflict with Johnson v. State, 877 So.2d 795 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

Affirmed; direct conflict certified.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

895 So. 2d 1202, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2025, 2005 WL 418705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luma-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack