Lulu Danelian A/K/A Lulu Beston Powers A/K/A Lulu Powers v. Charles A. Hicks

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 24, 2018
Docket13-18-00227-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Lulu Danelian A/K/A Lulu Beston Powers A/K/A Lulu Powers v. Charles A. Hicks (Lulu Danelian A/K/A Lulu Beston Powers A/K/A Lulu Powers v. Charles A. Hicks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lulu Danelian A/K/A Lulu Beston Powers A/K/A Lulu Powers v. Charles A. Hicks, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-18-00227-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

LULU DANELIAN A/K/A LULU BESTON POWERS A/K/A LULU POWERS, Appellant,

v.

CHARLES A. HICKS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras, and Hinojosa Memorandum Opinion by Justice Rodriguez

Appellant, Lulu Danelian a/k/a Lulu Beston Powers a/k/a Lulu Powers, filed an

appeal from a judgment entered by the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in

cause number 2017DCV-0832-F. Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds the parties have reached an agreement and appellant no longer

wishes to pursue the appeal. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s unopposed

motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is

hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d)

("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ Justice

Delivered and filed the 24th day of May, 2018.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lulu Danelian A/K/A Lulu Beston Powers A/K/A Lulu Powers v. Charles A. Hicks, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lulu-danelian-aka-lulu-beston-powers-aka-lulu-powers-v-charles-a-texapp-2018.