Lulejian v. Hagopian
This text of 173 A. 105 (Lulejian v. Hagopian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The record in this appeal discloses a controversy between two factions of the congregation of St. Gregory Armenian Apostolic Church. The matter was partially heard in the court below on a rule for a preliminary injunction. The trial judge, after hearing the evidence presented, stated in substance there was not sufficient *418 evidence to warrant a decision in favor of either party and that the case should go to a final hearing. The rule for a preliminary injunction was discharged. An examination of the testimony justifies the action of the trial judge and fails to establish an abuse of discretion.
Appeal dismissed, costs to await final determination of the proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
173 A. 105, 315 Pa. 417, 1934 Pa. LEXIS 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lulejian-v-hagopian-pa-1934.