Luko v. Luko

Missouri Court of Appeals

Luko v. Luko

213 S.W.3d 184, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 172, 2007 WL 220190

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 30, 2007·No. ED 87773·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kathy Lynn Luko (Wife) appeals from the trial court’s amended judgment of dissolution and denial of her request for a new trial. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. The trial court’s decision is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kathy Lynn Luko (Wife) appeals from the trial court’s amended judgment of dissolution and denial of her request for a new trial. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. The trial court’s decision is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Luko v. Luko, 213 S.W.3d 184, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 172, 2007 WL 220190 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

213 S.W.3d 184 (Luko v. Luko) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related