Lukes v. Commissioner
Opinion
MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION
SWIFT,
Petitioner's estimate of the total business-related expenses incurred by him that were not reimbursed by Northridge Securities, in 1981 are as follows:
| Type of Expense | 1981 Estimate |
| Long Distance Telephone Calls | $ 6,000 |
| Cards and Stationery | 500 |
| Postage Stamps | 300 |
| Business Luncheons | 480 |
| Extension on Trade Dates | 1,200 |
| Write-off Charges | 3,000 |
| Total | $ 11,480 |
Write-off charges involved situations where petitioner's clients neglected*142 to pay amounts due on their accounts with Northridge Securities. In those situations, petitioner had to pay the delinquent amounts, apparently without reimbursement from the clients.
Petitioner was considered by Northridge Securities to be an independent contractor. Commission payments to him from Northridge Securities in 1981 totaled $ 24,618. Petitioner, however, did not make any estimated tax payments in 1981, nor did he file a 1981 Federal income tax return.
OPINION
Petitioner claims that in spite of his failure to document expenses related to his brokerage income, his estimates of those expenses should be allowed. Petitioner also claims that, based
The business-related luncheons are governed by section 274(d) which requires substantiation by adequate records or by sufficient evidence corroborating the taxpayer's own statement to support a deduction therefor. Based on petitioner's general testimony, we cannot estimate any amount for allowable business luncheons.
On the facts of this case, petitioner's failure to file a return and keep adequate books and records relating to his business income and expenses establishes his liability*143 for the additions to tax.
Footnotes
2.
.Hable v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1984-485↩
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1988 T.C. Memo. 116 (Lukes v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.