Lukes v. Commissioner

1988 T.C. Memo. 116, 55 T.C.M. 410, 1988 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 141
United States Tax Court·Decided March 16, 1988·No. Docket No. 29000-85.·Unpublished

Opinion

MICHAEL A. LUKES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Lukes v. Commissioner
Docket No. 29000-85.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1988-116; 1988 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 141; 55 T.C.M. (CCH) 410; T.C.M. (RIA) 88116;
March 16, 1988.
Michael A. Lukes, pro se.
James B. Ausenbaugh, for the respondent.

SWIFT

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

SWIFT, Judge: Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner's Federal income tax liability for 1981 and additions to tax as follows:

Petitioner's estimate of the total business-related expenses incurred by him that were not reimbursed by Northridge Securities, in 1981 are as follows:

Type of Expense1981 Estimate
Long Distance Telephone Calls$ 6,000
Cards and Stationery500
Postage Stamps300
Business Luncheons480
Extension on Trade Dates1,200
Write-off Charges3,000
Total$ 11,480

Write-off charges involved situations where petitioner's clients neglected*142 to pay amounts due on their accounts with Northridge Securities. In those situations, petitioner had to pay the delinquent amounts, apparently without reimbursement from the clients.

Petitioner was considered by Northridge Securities to be an independent contractor. Commission payments to him from Northridge Securities in 1981 totaled $ 24,618. Petitioner, however, did not make any estimated tax payments in 1981, nor did he file a 1981 Federal income tax return.

OPINION

Petitioner claims that in spite of his failure to document expenses related to his brokerage income, his estimates of those expenses should be allowed. Petitioner also claims that, based

The business-related luncheons are governed by section 274(d) which requires substantiation by adequate records or by sufficient evidence corroborating the taxpayer's own statement to support a deduction therefor. Based on petitioner's general testimony, we cannot estimate any amount for allowable business luncheons. Sec. 1.274-5, Income Tax Regs.

On the facts of this case, petitioner's failure to file a return and keep adequate books and records relating to his business income and expenses establishes his liability*143 for the additions to tax. Stovall v. Commissioner,762 F.2d 891, 895 (11th Cir. 1985), affg. a Memorandum Opinion of this Court; Smith v. Commissioner,66 T.C. 622, 651 (1976), revd. and remanded on another issue 601 F.2d 196 (5th Cir. 1979). 2

Decision will be entered under Rule 155.


Footnotes

  • 2. Hable v. Commissioner,T.C. Memo. 1984-485.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lukes v. Commissioner, 1988 T.C. Memo. 116, 55 T.C.M. 410, 1988 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 141 (tax 1988).

1988 T.C. Memo. 116 (Lukes v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rawlin L. Stovall v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
762 F.2d 891 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)
Smith v. Commissioner
66 T.C. 622 (U.S. Tax Court, 1976)