Luke v. Wainwright

431 F.2d 485
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 17, 1970
DocketNos. 29573, 29577
StatusPublished

This text of 431 F.2d 485 (Luke v. Wainwright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Luke v. Wainwright, 431 F.2d 485 (5th Cir. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The sole issue on this appeal from the denial of petition for habeas corpus is whether the comments of the prosecutor in closing argument to the jury in the state trial constituted comment upon the failure of appellants to take the stand and testify in their own behalf.

We agree with the district court, after a study of the remarks in question, that the jury could not have interpreted them as commentary on the failure of the appellants to take the stand, and therefore affirm. Garcia v. United States, 5th Cir. 1963, 315 F.2d 133; Samuels v. United States, 5th Cir. 1968, 398 F.2d 964; Williams v. Wainwright, 5th Cir. 1969, 416 F.2d 1042; Parks v. Wainwright, 5th Cir. 1970, 429 F.2d 1240.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
431 F.2d 485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luke-v-wainwright-ca5-1970.