Luke v. State

867 So. 2d 617, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2867, 2004 WL 433786
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 10, 2004
DocketNo. 2D02-2005
StatusPublished

This text of 867 So. 2d 617 (Luke v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Luke v. State, 867 So. 2d 617, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2867, 2004 WL 433786 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sherod Dion Luke appeals his judgment and sentence for conspiracy to commit robbery. We affirm the conviction but remand to correct a scrivener’s error in the judgment. The judgment erroneously lists Mr. Luke’s conviction as conspiracy to commit robbery with a firearm, a second-degree felony. The State concedes that the judgment should reflect the actual charge and conviction of conspiracy to commit robbery, a third-degree felony. See § 777.04, Fla. Stat. (2000).

Affirmed; remanded to correct scrivener’s error.

ALTENBERND, C.J., and WHATLEY and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
867 So. 2d 617, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2867, 2004 WL 433786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luke-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.