Luke v. Fireco, LLC
This text of Luke v. Fireco, LLC (Luke v. Fireco, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Vermont Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Luke v. Fireco, LLC, No. 1244-12-14 Cncv (Toor, J., May 12, 2015).
[The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy of the text and the accompanying data included in the Vermont trial court opinion database is not guaranteed.]
VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CHITTENDEN UNIT CIVIL DIVISION
│ VICTORIA LUKE, et al., │ Plaintiffs │ │ v. │ Docket No. 1244-12-14 Cncv │ │ FIRECO, LLC, et al., │ Defendants │ │
RULING ON MOTION TO COMPEL
This is an employment discrimination case involving allegations of sexual harassment,
race discrimination, and wrongful termination. Plaintiffs seek financial discovery related to their
claims for punitive damages; Defendants object.
Plaintiffs’ position is that because their complaint seeks punitive damages, they are
entitled to discovery at the get-go. The problem with this approach is that a plaintiff could make
an entirely frivolous claim for punitive damages and then be entitled to sensitive financial
information from a defendant. The court concludes that the more equitable approach is to allow a
defendant to move for summary judgment, at least on the punitive damages claim, before such
discovery is mandated. Thus, other discovery can be completed and a dispositive motion filed
before a defendant is required to disclose its financials. The court is not, however, inclined to
delay discovery until after the initial phase of trial as some courts appear to have done (although
it might consider bifurcating the order of trial so that the jury would address the merits first and
damages immediately thereafter). If defendant chooses not to seek summary judgment on this
issue by the September 7 motion deadline, the discovery may proceed. Order
The motion to compel is denied. The motion may be renewed at a later date if necessary.
Dated at Burlington this 12th day of May, 2015.
_____________________________ Helen M. Toor Superior Court Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Luke v. Fireco, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luke-v-fireco-llc-vtsuperct-2015.