Luke v. Crumley
This text of 118 S.E.2d 488 (Luke v. Crumley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the instant case no error of law is complained of, and the verdict rendered in favor of the defendant is amply supported by evidence and has the approval of the trial judge. Hence, there is no merit in the contention that it was erroneous to deny the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, based only on the usual general grounds. For a former appearance of this litigation, see Luke v. Crumley, 214 Ga. 638 (106 S. E. 2d 776), where it was held that the court erred in sustaining a general demurrer to the plaintiff’s amended petition, since it stated a cause of action for some of the relief sought.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
118 S.E.2d 488, 216 Ga. 622, 1961 Ga. LEXIS 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luke-v-crumley-ga-1961.